November 2008 - hibernate-issues - Jboss List Archives

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3125) BigDecimal support for id generator from DB sequence

by Tomas Rada (JIRA)

BigDecimal support for id generator from DB sequence ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-3125 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3125 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: New Feature Environment: Hibernate 3.2, Oracle 10 Reporter: Tomas Rada Currently with using BigDecimal as entity id is thrown exception " this id generator generates long, integer, short or string" - class "IdentifierGeneratorFactory". Is there possibility to add BigDecimal support for id generator? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

6
9
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2975) Interceptor onFlushDirty collections - previous and current state the same instance

by Clayton J. Kovar (JIRA)

Interceptor onFlushDirty collections - previous and current state the same instance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2975 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2975 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Components: core Affects Versions: 3.2.2 Environment: Hibernate 3.2.2 - Oracle thin driver 10.1.0.4.0 Reporter: Clayton J. Kovar When calling Session.merge(entity) {therefore the previous state is available} the interceptor's onFlushDirty is called and the previous state for all of the simple properties correctly passes the previous values but with a collection the same collection instance is passed in both the previous and current state arrays. So far I have only seen this behavior on a Map with a one-to-many relationship to another entity. I have not tried it yet with Lists, Sets, or Bags. I'm assuming this is not expected behavior, but please let me know if it is. Best regards. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2862) Collection is not associated with any session exception when doing an eager fetch on a non-unique collection.

by Paul Andrews (JIRA)

Collection is not associated with any session exception when doing an eager fetch on a non-unique collection. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2862 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2862 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Environment: Hibernate 3.1.3 - Hibernate 3.2.5, HSQLDB, Java5 Reporter: Paul Andrews It is basically caused by having an eager collection where the key of the collection is not unique in the results. The code works as follows in CollectionType.getCollection(): .... persistenceContext.addUninitializedCollection( persister, collection, key ); // some collections are not lazy: if ( initializeImmediately( entityMode ) ) { session.initializeCollection( collection, false ); } else if ( !persister.isLazy() ) { persistenceContext.addNonLazyCollection( collection ); } if ( hasHolder( entityMode ) ) { session.getPersistenceContext().addCollectionHolder( collection ); } if persistenceContext.addUninitializedCollection() detects that the collection with the given key has already been added it clears the session on the old instance of the collection (sets it to null). However, that collection has already been added to the persistence context by an earlier call to this method. So later when StatefulPersistenceContext.initializeNonLazyCollections() is called it iterates through all of the collections in the persistence context (including those which have had their session set to null by addUninitializedCollection()), calling forceInitialization() which throws a 'collection is not associated with any session' exception. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

10
11
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-1985) NodeTraverser is not SOE-safe

by Sergey Vladimirov (JIRA)

NodeTraverser is not SOE-safe ----------------------------- Key: HHH-1985 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1985 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Improvement Components: core Versions: 3.2.0.cr3 Reporter: Sergey Vladimirov Priority: Minor org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser It is possible for java.lang.StackOverflowError to occur in NodeTraverser.java:41;42 with very deep tree. Need another algorith to visit whole tree. 08.08 19:50:09 ERROR [ArpSiteServlet] Servlet.service() for servlet ArpSiteServlet threw exception java.lang.StackOverflowError at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:41) at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:41) at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:42) at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:42) at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:42) at org.hibernate.hql.ast.util.NodeTraverser.visitDepthFirst(NodeTraverser.java:42) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

7
9
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HBX-869) SchemaUpdateTask does not actually APPLY the DDL on Mysql 5.0

by Schwark Satyavolu (JIRA)

SchemaUpdateTask does not actually APPLY the DDL on Mysql 5.0 ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HBX-869 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-869 Project: Hibernate Tools Type: Bug Components: ant Versions: 3.2beta9 Environment: Mysql 5.0, windows Reporter: Schwark Satyavolu Priority: Critical The ant task in verbose mode shows that the table does not exist, prints the ddl for the create table, but in fact does NOT create the table. Yet, the build is reported successful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

3
2
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2288) Adding a new ResultTransformer, permitting to instantiate and fill related beans and not to take care of aliases case.

by Nicolas Billard (JIRA)

Adding a new ResultTransformer, permitting to instantiate and fill related beans and not to take care of aliases case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2288 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2288 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Improvement Components: query-sql, query-hql, query-criteria Versions: 3.2.1 Environment: Developped based on hibernate v 3.2.1 Reporter: Nicolas Billard Priority: Minor Attachments: ResultTransformerImprovement.zip Are joined to this post 2 classes. Below is the javadoc header of the ResultTransformer class. May be this could be integrated in next hibernate versions ( certainly with improvements ... :p ) Let me know if anyone finds it useful ... ------------------------------------------------------ * Transforms resultset to value a bean, via setters. * * Examples: * * bean MyBean as 2 setters : * - setId : takes an Integer * - setProduct : takes a Product bean * * Product bean as 2 setters : * - setId * - setLib * * resultset may have these columns : * - ID * - PRODUCT_ID * - PRODUCT_LIB * * A MyBean instance will be created for each tupple, * and a Product instance will be also created, filled with PRODUCT_ID and PRODUCT_LIB values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

3
8
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (EJB-387) The EntityManager.lock() uses the wrong column name when it is passed a sub-type entity from a joined inheritance strategy

by mike wray (JIRA)

The EntityManager.lock() uses the wrong column name when it is passed a sub-type entity from a joined inheritance strategy -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: EJB-387 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/EJB-387 Project: Hibernate Entity Manager Issue Type: Bug Components: EntityManager Affects Versions: 3.4.0.GA Environment: Hibernate 3.3.1 Annotations 3.4 Reporter: mike wray Priority: Minor I would expect to see: update SUPER set ROW_VERSION_SEQ=? where SUPER_ID=? and ROW_VERSION_SEQ=? but instead I see: update SUPER set ROW_VERSION_SEQ=? where SUB_ID=? and ROW_VERSION_SEQ=? which throws a org.hibernate.exception.SQLGrammarException: could not retrieve version. This is because column SUB_ID does not exist on table SUPER. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

4
3
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2753) not-found="ignore" causes many-to-one to be always eager

by Fred Gurkov (JIRA)

not-found="ignore" causes many-to-one to be always eager -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2753 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2753 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Components: core Affects Versions: 3.2.4.sp1, 3.2.2, 3.1.3 Environment: Tested with 3.1.3, 3.2.2ga, 3.2.4sp1 using Oracle 10g DB. Reporter: Fred Gurkov If not-found property of many-to-one mapping is set to "ignore", the association always gets eagerly initialized regardless of the value of the "lazy" property. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

4
4
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2501) Read-only state of an entity in a session to propagate into subsequently lazy-loaded entities.

by Gunther Schadow (JIRA)

Read-only state of an entity in a session to propagate into subsequently lazy-loaded entities. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2501 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2501 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Improvement Components: core Environment: any Reporter: Gunther Schadow ISSUE: Given an Entity entity and after Session.setReadOnly(entity), if the entity has lazy collections, lazy properties etc., other Entities are loaded into the Session upon navigating the object graph in the default read-writable state. However, it seems more reasonable to maintain the read-only state of the owning object. REQUEST: Ability to propagate read-only state of an entity in a session into other lazy-loaded entities. BACKGROUND: We have a system which permits users to make concurrent transactions which involve many of the same objects. Usually no changes happen on these shared objects, but instead connections (links) are made between these objects and new objects. For example, say you have an online meeting system, and every Meeting held has a link to a number of User object. The User objects are never changed in a Meeting, but there is a Relation called Participation (of User in Meeting) to which new relationships are added. When a new meeting is saved, it wants to save the User objects simply because a new Participation link entry was added to the collection. To an extent we can prevent this from happening by setting the Users explicitly to read-only. However, now suppose we added a function "Invite your Friends" to a Meeting, in which we would simply go: for(User friend : currentUser.getFriends()) meeting.addInvitation(friend); Now an Invitation is like a Participation, and would be added into the User but now it wants to save these users just for a version upgrade only because they have received an Invitation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

5
13
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HBX-1074) DelegatingReverseEngineeringStratey.columnToHibernateTypeName reports invalid values

by Joel Schuster (JIRA)

DelegatingReverseEngineeringStratey.columnToHibernateTypeName reports invalid values ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HBX-1074 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-1074 Project: Hibernate Tools Issue Type: Improvement Components: reverse-engineer Affects Versions: 3.2.1 Environment: MyEclipse w/ Hibernate rev engineering against Oracle 10g Reporter: Joel Schuster When implementing an extention to the [u]DelegatingReverseEngineeringStrategy [/u]the [u]columnToHibernateTypeName [/u]does not report the true value of the [b]precision [/b]and [b]scale [/b]column of the table description/definition. The method signature: [code]@Override public String columnToHibernateTypeName( TableIdentifier table, String columnName, int sqlType, int length, int precision, int scale, boolean nullable, boolean generatedIdentifier) {[/code] The precision and scale parameters are [b]int[/b]. If the values in the definition are [b]null[/b] the values reported here come out as DATA_LENGTH and 0. Not null. These parameters should be [b]Integer[/b] and be set to [b]null [/b]when applicable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

3
3
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

hibernate-issues November 2008