[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (EJB-276) Support for CLOB not working for DB2 when table per concrete class is being used
by breako (JIRA)
Support for CLOB not working for DB2 when table per concrete class is being used
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: EJB-276
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/EJB-276
Project: Hibernate Entity Manager
Type: Bug
Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: breako
Hi,
This came up in the forums:
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?p=2344008#2344008
Sample code: Two Pojos
@Entity
public class Person {
private int i;
@Identity
public int getI() {
return i;
}
public void setI(int i){
this.i = i;
}
}
@Entity
public class Employee extends Person{
@Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
@Lob
public String getClobAttr() {
return clobAttr;
}
public void setClobAttr(String clobAttr) {
this.clobAttr = clobAttr;
}
}
Simple test:
public static void main (String args[]) {
Query queryImpl = em.createQuery(" from Person");
List list = queryImpl.getResultList();
}
This will generate SQL
select person0_.clobAttr as clobAttr1 from (select nullif(0,0) as clobAttr from TPerson union all select clobAttr from TEmployee) person0_
which chucks the exception:
DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -415, SQLSTATE: 42825, SQLERRMC: null
I think the SQL hibernate should generate should be:
select person0_.clobAttr as clobAttr1 from (select cast(null as CLOB) as clobAttr from TPerson union all select clobAttr from TEmployee) person0_
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3836) composite-element with null columns in map is ignored
by Benoit Goudreault-Emond (JIRA)
composite-element with null columns in map is ignored
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3836
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3836
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.3.0.SP1
Environment: 3.3.0 SP1, noticed with Oracle and H2 but probably happens with all databases
Reporter: Benoit Goudreault-Emond
Attachments: patate.zip
When a composite element with all properties set to NULL is inserted in a map of the said composite element, the data gets inserted to the database but is never retreived when reloading the entity.
For instance, with an entity
@Entity
public class TestEntity {
@Id
private int id;
@CollectionOfElements
private Map<String, AccessPeriod> roleAccesses = new HashMap<String, AccessPeriod>();
// boilerplate getters/setters/etc omitted
}
And AccessPeriod being
@Embeddable
public class AccessPeriod {
public Date startDate;
public Date endDate;
}
If you insert in the map an AccessPeriod with both startDate and endDate set to null and persist the TestEntity,
an entry is inserted in the auxiliary table, but when getting the TestEntity back, the map is empty.
You get the same problem with a mapping file.
This used to work in Hibernate 2.1--I found this out while porting some code to 3.3.
See the attached example. You'll need to include Hibernate and h2 (com.h2database:h2 1.0.20061217) on your classpath to run it with the given jdbc.properties, but feel free to change it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2955) Unnecessary version updates in two cases.
by Sławomir Wojtasiak (JIRA)
Unnecessary version updates in two cases.
-----------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2955
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2955
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.5
Environment: JDK 5.0
Reporter: Sławomir Wojtasiak
Attachments: HibernateTest.zip
I found two situations where hibernate generates unnecessary version updates. Let's illustrate it with a simple example:
Session session = SessionFactory.getSession();
Transaction transaction = session.getTransaction();
transaction.begin();
Article a = new Article();
a.setName( "atricle" );
*********************************************
*** Quantity is the owner of the relation ***
*********************************************
Quantity q = new Quantity();
q.setName( "quantity" );
q.setArticle( a );
a.getQuantities().add( q );
session.persist( a );
session.flush();
***** Hibernate generates following SQLs *****
Hibernate: select nextval ('hibernate_sequence')
Hibernate: select nextval ('hibernate_sequence')
Hibernate: insert into Article (name, version, id) values (?, ?, ?)
Hibernate: insert into Quantity (article_id, name, version, id) values (?, ?, ?, ?)
**********************************************
a.getQuantities().clear();
session.flush();
*** Hibernate generates following SQLs ***
Hibernate: update Article set name=?, version=? where id=? and version=?
This update of version field is performed because collection of quantities is marked as dirty, but Article entity is not relation owner so nothing change in database after this clear. Should it works like this? It looks like a bug because database remain unchanged so version changing is unnecessary in my opinion.
******************************************
session.clear();
**** SECOND PROBLEM ***
Now I generate true copy of persisted objects.
Notice that I use HashSet instead of PersistSet which was set during persist operation. This operation is similar to merging objects prepared by SOAP, during communication with remote client for example.
***********************
Article a1 = new Article();
a1.setId( a.getId() );
a1.setName( a.getName() );
a1.setVersion( a.getVersion() );
Quantity q1 = new Quantity();
q1.setArticle( a1 );
q1.setName( q.getName() );
q1.setVersion( q.getVersion() );
q1.setId( q.getId() );
a1.getQuantities().add( q1 );
a1 = (Article)session.merge( a1 );
session.flush();
***** This operation generates following SQLs *****
Hibernate: select article0_.id as id0_1_, article0_.name as name0_1_, article0_.version as version0_1_, quantities1_.article_id as article4_3_, quantities1_.id as id3_, quantities1_.id as id1_0_, quantities1_.article_id as article4_1_0_, quantities1_.name as name1_0_, quantities1_.version as version1_0_ from Article article0_ left outer join Quantity quantities1_ on article0_.id=quantities1_.article_id where article0_.id=?
Hibernate: update Article set name=?, version=? where id=? and version=?
It looks like problem is located in replaceElements() method of CollectgionType class (or somewhere near it). Maybe I'm wrong but this collection was checked for changes during merge operation (See this select above.) so why it remains dirty if it contains the same data as database?. I checked this issue on other JPA implementations (OpenJPA for example) and version is not incremented after similar merge operation.
*****************************************************
transaction.rollback();
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 4 months