[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275?page=c...
]
Steve Ebersole commented on HHH-5275:
-------------------------------------
Graeme, just to clarify, we also cannot address "alias specific lock mode" in
4.0.1 either for the same reasons. That would need to wait for 4.1. I guess what I am
saying is that for 4.0.1/3.6.whatever-the-hell-we-are-up-to-now we could address that
"FOR UPDATE" or whatever actually gets applied.
Criteria.setLockMode does not work correctly
--------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-5275
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.5.2, 3.5.3
Environment: Hibernate 3.5.2, Oracle 10 (using
org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle10gDialect
Reporter: Björn Moritz
Assignee: Steve Ebersole
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0.1
Attachments: AnotherOracle10gDialect.java, My_Oracle10Dialect.java,
My_Oracle10Dialect.java, TestCase.zip
Time Spent: 2h 19m
The LockMode set via Criteria.setLockMode does not generate a ' for update' SQL
statement. In the org.hibernate.dialect.Dialect class only the LockOptions are used for
determining a possible addition to the SQL statement if using pessimistic locking. This
behaviour is different from Hibernate 3.1.3.
In the supplied TestCase two threads are reading the same database record; one of those
threads should use pessimistic locking thereby blocking the other thread. But both threads
can read the database record causing the test to fail.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira