[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=c...
]
Mark Derricutt commented on HHH-3671:
-------------------------------------
Hey Adam,
I just spent some time tracing the code and seeing if I could spot it, and I have - or at
least I believe so. And I believe its just a foobar on my own part (or more, our schema,
and ensuing confusion).
This all relates to our use of subclassed entities, I have two tables: party_versions, and
person_versions. party_versions is for the super class and has _revision and
_revision_type, person_versions ALSO has _revision -AND- _revision_type.
My guess is this second _revision_type column is actually redundant, which is why I never
seeing it being inserted. Looking at my party_versions table I see that _revision_type is
populated properly.
So it looks like I my schema file (generated manually) included several redundant
columns.
Can you confirm this behaviour/confusion is correct? If so - feel free to close this
ticket :)
The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom
revision type field name throught the properties
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3671
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assignee: Adam Warski
Fix For: 3.4
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira