[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275?page=c...
]
Chad Wilson commented on HHH-5275:
----------------------------------
Yes, this also occurred to me when trying to adapt the workarounds attached here to work
in the more general case. I'm really not sure what the behaviour should be, to be
honest. Would that mean it should generate a FOR UPDATE OF clause including every
query-related table's alias *except* "cat"? Surely that'd be a lot to
ask!
Criteria.setLockMode does not work correctly
--------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-5275
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.5.2, 3.5.3
Environment: Hibernate 3.5.2, Oracle 10 (using
org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle10gDialect
Reporter: Björn Moritz
Assignee: Steve Ebersole
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0.1
Attachments: AnotherOracle10gDialect.java, My_Oracle10Dialect.java,
My_Oracle10Dialect.java, TestCase.zip
Time Spent: 2h 19m
The LockMode set via Criteria.setLockMode does not generate a ' for update' SQL
statement. In the org.hibernate.dialect.Dialect class only the LockOptions are used for
determining a possible addition to the SQL statement if using pessimistic locking. This
behaviour is different from Hibernate 3.1.3.
In the supplied TestCase two threads are reading the same database record; one of those
threads should use pessimistic locking thereby blocking the other thread. But both threads
can read the database record causing the test to fail.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira