[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-960?pag...
]
Hardy Ferentschik commented on HSEARCH-960:
-------------------------------------------
Right, let's go for a warning for now
I like the idea of taking care of the analyizing step. As you say, we could do this
earlier similar to what we do in Analyzer utils. Would also make dynamic analyzer
selection easier. Do you see any drawback in doing it ourselves?
Nevertheless, for now let's stick with what we have and add a warning.
Index.UN_TOKENIZED overrides other tokenized fields that share the
same name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HSEARCH-960
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-960
Project: Hibernate Search
Issue Type: Bug
Components: mapping
Affects Versions: 3.4.0.Final
Environment: 3.4.0 Final
Reporter: John-Michael Au
Assignee: Hardy Ferentschik
Labels: annotations, bug, override, tokenized, un_tokenized
Fix For: 3.4.2, 4.0.0.CR2
Marking one field as un-tokenized causes all other fields with the same names to be
un-tokenized.
i.e.
{code}
@Field(name = "simple_search", index = Index.UN_TOKENIZED, store = Store.NO)
private String string;
@Field(name = "simple_search", index = Index.TOKENIZED, store = Store.NO)
private String string2;
{code}
The resulting behaviour is that "simple_search" will be made up of un-tokenized
'string' and 'string2' values, even though 'string2' was specified
to be tokenized.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira