[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2235?page=c...
]
Igor Lobanov commented on HHH-2235:
-----------------------------------
What about example, given in section 6.3.3 (Bidirectional associations with indexed
collections) of the Hibernate manual?
<class name="Parent">
<id name="id" column="parent_id"/>
....
<map name="children" inverse="true">
<key column="parent_id"/>
<map-key column="name" type="string"/>
<one-to-many class="Child"/>
</map>
</class>
Column 'name' is not a primary key. It is just regular database column. It is not
required to be null by anything but AbstractCollectionPersister#readIndex(...)
implementation. What if I want to add support for children without name?
Support for null map-keys in <map> mappings
-------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2235
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2235
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.0.ga
Reporter: Igor Lobanov
Priority: Minor
I'm not sure if I should file it as a bug.
Hibernate requires index column for <map> mappings to be not null. This is required
by the code in AbstractCollectionPersister#readIndex(...), which raises exception if index
column is null. However, when I override collection persister and force readIndex method
to return null, everything seems to work fine. Hibernate allows me to work with maps using
null value as a key. Though I havn't tested it extensivly yet.
What is the reason for disallowing null values as a keys? If there are possible
complicated error conditions, then this issue is a feature request for null-values support
for <map> mappings. If there are no errors possible, then constraining such behavior
is probably wrong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira