]
Steve Ebersole closed HHH-3256.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
No it should not. See my comment on the linked issue.
OptimizerFactory$PooledOptimizer.generate doesn't set keep the
in-memory hi_value in sync with the db next_val (after a JBoss restart)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3256
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3256
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, MySQL 5
Reporter: Tom Muldoon
After a JBoss restart, the in-memory hiValue is -1. As such, the callback.getNextValue(
) method is invoked twice. With an increment size of 50 and a current database next_val
of 10000, the PooledOptimizer.generate method returns a value of 10000 (as expected) and
sets the in memory hiValue to 10050 (also as expected), however, it sets the db next_val
to 10100. Shouldn't the db next_val be kept in sync with the in-memory hiValue (i.e.
10050)?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: