Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
internationalization of applications themselves.
On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I would rather keep them simple.
We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Wondering...
>
> Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>
> Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev