5:40 p.m.
Wondering...
Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
10:02 a.m.
I would rather keep them simple.
We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Wondering...
Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
1:29 p.m.
Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
internationalization of applications themselves.
On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I would rather keep them simple.
We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Wondering...
>
> Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>
> Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bolesław Dawidowicz
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
1:35 p.m.
That is - in itself - a problem for an application with works-out-of-the-Box aspirations,
yes?
// vänlig hälsning,
// [sw: "best regards"],
//
// Lennart Jörelid
15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen
<sthorger(a)redhat.com>:
Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide internationalization of
applications themselves.
> On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I would rather keep them simple.
>
> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Wondering...
> >
> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
1:40 p.m.
Got no clue what you're saying
On 15 September 2015 at 13:35, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jorelid(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
That is - in itself - a problem for an application with
works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
// vänlig hälsning,
// [sw: "best regards"],
//
// Lennart Jörelid
15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>:
Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
internationalization of applications themselves.
On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I would rather keep them simple.
>
> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would
> fit.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Wondering...
> >
> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
1:50 p.m.
On 9/15/2015 7:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Got no clue what you're saying
I think he is perhaps saying
that developers who don't speak English
should be able to learn and use Keycloak out of the box.
I was asking if it is a productization requirement.
On 15 September 2015 at 13:35, Lennart Jörelid
<lennart.jorelid(a)gmail.com <mailto:lennart.jorelid@gmail.com>> wrote:
That is - in itself - a problem for an application with
works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
// vänlig hälsning,
// [sw: "best regards"],
//
// Lennart Jörelid
15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com
<mailto:sthorger@redhat.com>>:
> Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
> internationalization of applications themselves.
>
> On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz
> <bdawidow(a)redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> I would rather keep them simple.
>
> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then
> it would fit.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert
> <ssilvert(a)redhat.com <mailto:ssilvert@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > Wondering...
> >
> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it?
> Right now,
> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console
> uses 1.4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Boles?aw Dawidowicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
3145
days inactive
3146
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Boleslaw Dawidowicz -
Lennart Jörelid -
Stan Silvert -
Stian Thorgersen