Hmmm I'm not sure about that. That would be the completely opposite of what
we already do to any repository today. If people want the stable release of
the quickstarts they could just get 3.x or download the zip files, nope?
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:15 PM Sebastien Blanc <sblanc(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We should also consider the opposite : master is the stable released
version and a branch for development . I already had confused people
downloading KC server and cloning the QuickStarts and expecting it to work.
But tbh I do not have a string opinion on that.
Le jeu. 18 mai 2017 à 18:57, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> a
écrit :
> While working today on the fix of some quickstarts. I'm
> considering to create a separated branch only for stable versions of the
> quickstarts.
>
> In this way 'master' would be used only for development based on the
> latest bits from Keycloak repo. And 3.1.x, to the latest stable
> release on Maven central.
>
> Does it make any sense?
>
> --
>
> abstractj
>
_______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>