On 8/4/2014 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hello, > > as part of the UPS release we are improving our own 'user guide' for the > UPS. Current status is visible here: > http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/ > > In this guide, there is a section that is called "Administration of the > UnifiedPush Server", which should be explaining the Keycloak's Admin > Console UI features (see [1]). The doc would contain a bunch of > screenshots and little sentences to explain the reason of these > different screens, similar to: > http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/admin-ui/ > > However, before starting too early on this document, I was wondering > about a few things :-) > > * there is no such 'Console UI guide' from the Keycloak team, atm - > right ? If so, that's totally fine and I am happy to create one for UPS. > Hopefully some of its conent can be reused by the KC team. Would be cool > if we can work on improving that document together > Our console guide is pretty much mixed in with our normal docs. We wouldn't have a separate guide I don't think. There's really not much of an API to document and it is all config files, and admin UI. What we need to do is add screen shots and stuff.

> * are you guys planning significant changes to the Admin Console UI, > after the beta4 has been released? I've seen some PRs around "UI > federation" (I am not familiar w/ the details around that), but that > seems to be done once we have the beta4 release available. > Federation stuff is already in (last week). Some UI changes that might come in: * Scope pages for application/oauth client will have option to allow any role. * I'm thinking of combining oauth client and application together. need to get feedback from Stian and Marek though before I do this. Other than that, there will only be minor cosmetic changes.

Bill -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Monday, 4 August, 2014 3:48:56 PM > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak Admin Console UI - a little guide > > > > On 8/4/2014 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> Hello, >> >> as part of the UPS release we are improving our own 'user guide' for the >> UPS. Current status is visible here: >> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/ >> >> In this guide, there is a section that is called "Administration of the >> UnifiedPush Server", which should be explaining the Keycloak's Admin >> Console UI features (see [1]). The doc would contain a bunch of >> screenshots and little sentences to explain the reason of these >> different screens, similar to: >> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/admin-ui/ >> >> However, before starting too early on this document, I was wondering >> about a few things :-) >> >> * there is no such 'Console UI guide' from the Keycloak team, atm - >> right ? If so, that's totally fine and I am happy to create one for UPS. >> Hopefully some of its conent can be reused by the KC team. Would be cool >> if we can work on improving that document together >> > Our console guide is pretty much mixed in with our normal docs. We > wouldn't have a separate guide I don't think. There's really not much > of an API to document and it is all config files, and admin UI. What we > need to do is add screen shots and stuff. > >> * are you guys planning significant changes to the Admin Console UI, >> after the beta4 has been released? I've seen some PRs around "UI >> federation" (I am not familiar w/ the details around that), but that >> seems to be done once we have the beta4 release available. >> > Federation stuff is already in (last week). > > Some UI changes that might come in: > > * Scope pages for application/oauth client will have option to allow any > role. > * I'm thinking of combining oauth client and application together. need > to get feedback from Stian and Marek though before I do this. +1 To combining these - I'd even say we should combine these in the model as well.

> Other than that, there will only be minor cosmetic changes. > > Bill > > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev > _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev