11:29 a.m.
Thanks, that helps. I'm happy to go with that approach, but it would
help me if I understood why most of the values in keycloak.json are not
needed by keycloak.js.
Are "token-store", "public-client" etc totally ignored by
keycloak.js?
A quick grep suggests that they are ignored.
--
Michael Clayton
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:45:59AM +0200, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
You don't need to pass in the whole keycloak.json like this, to
initialize
it without the request for keycloak.json just do:
new Keycloak({
realm: "myReam",
clientId: "myClientId"
}
That's it.
On 14 April 2016 at 21:59, Michael Clayton <mclayton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm integrating keycloak.js with the Red Hat Customer Portal and have a
> question about passing a configuration object into the Keycloak()
> constructor.
>
> At the point where I call Keycloak(), I'm attempting to avoid waiting
> for the keycloak.json HTTP GET by inlining keycloak.json during a build
> step. By example, my build now produces this:
>
> var keycloak = new Keycloak({
> "realm" : "myRealm",
> "realm-public-key" : "myPublicKey",
> "auth-server-url" : "https://keycloak.me/auth",
> "ssl-required" : "external",
> "resource" : "myClientId",
> "public-client" : true,
> "token-store": "cookie"
> });
>
> I was hoping this would Just Work, but I quickly discovered that some of
> the properties are "renamed" after the HTTP request:
>
> kc.authServerUrl = config['auth-server-url'];
> kc.realm = config['realm'];
> kc.clientId = config['resource'];
> kc.clientSecret = (config['credentials'] || {})['secret'];
>
> And thus my setup doesn't work because "clientId" doesn't exist
inside
> keycloak.json.
>
> My question is: would I be foolish to rename the properties inside
> keycloak.json so that the JSON can be passed directly into the Keycloak
> constructor? For example, "resource" becomes "clientId" and
> "auth-server-url" becomes "authServerUrl".
>
> It would be really convenient if I could give keycloak.js the contents
> of keycloak.json without having to fret about where it came from (AJAX
> or hardcoded or build-inlined). If others would like that feature too,
> I'd happily put together a contribution.
>
> Thanks for any advice!
>
> --
> Michael Clayton
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>