Hi,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Darimont <
thomas.darimont(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
yes I understand that - and I agree that falling back to the default
client in case of a missing client is not a good idea.
I understand this as well, but it has not been uncommon to encounter a
situation where the user needs to know where to go next, because Keycloak
doesn't have a link available.
Maybe and hopefully it's just related to the development phase when
applications are redeployed often.
@Thomas
Initially I also thought about having a default redirect url per realm but
then I thought that simply refering to a client_id and let keycloak
redirect the user
appropriatly would be more flexible, especially because you can then also
leverage all the client metadata that is available for a client (name,
description etc.).
Defining an existing client as a default is indeed a better idea. I
probably misunderstood you first.
Best regards,
Thomas