Ok :-)
Should I write a JIRA issue?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Juraj
2016-01-11 18:33 GMT+01:00 Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com>:
Yeah, i was lazy about that and forgot to put a check in later on.
On 1/11/2016 2:40 AM, Juraj Janosik wrote:
Hi,
is it a correct and expected behaviour in the group concept,
that the name of the group is not unique,
that means, that it is possible to create a new group with the same name?
The same behaviour occurs in Admin console and via REST API too.
[
{
"id": "150a8547-fd3f-4245-ab91-328d8afb83c2",
"name": "group_tests",
"path": "/group_tests",
"subGroups":
[
]
},
{
"id": "bc7969e6-e7c9-4617-b03e-18665293636a",
"name": "group_tests",
"path": "/group_tests",
"subGroups":
[
]
},
{
"id": "5447d305-a47e-4ad9-a29b-f478396accf6",
"name": "group_tests",
"path": "/group_tests",
"subGroups":
[
]
}
]
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Juraj
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red
Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user