Would it not make sense that a bearer-only aka a service is able to use the
authz services? Why does it need to be able to obtain tokens?
On 28 December 2016 at 02:19, Pedro Igor <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Your client can't be set as bearer-only on Keycloak Server. You can still
use bearer-only on the adapter configuration though. Keycloak doesn't allow
"bearer only" clients (when setting up your client on the server) to obtain
tokens from the server. Try to change your client to "confidential" on the
server and set bearer-only on your adapter configuration (keycloak.json).
Regards.
Pedro Igor
On 12/26/2016 1:34:06 PM, uğur kolip <ugur.kolip(a)gmail.com> wrote:
can we use bearer-only with authorization ?
if it can be , how can we use ? are there any example ?
when i try to use with photoz example , i get bad request (or 403 i am not
sure , i change a lot of thing)
Because i don't want redirect or store session , it can be used by mobil
apps .
Thank you for helping
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user