12:22 a.m.
Hi Team,
There are situations that we use update user rest API, to update just one element of user
(eg: enabled : false etc.) .
This requires a pre fetched user object from the GET user call, other wise rest of the
user information tend to be truncated after the update call.
Is there a possibility to update only specific elements of the user instead of sending
whole the user object (objective is to avoid the GET call right before the update call
and avoid possible tendency of data truncations )? Your kind reply is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Chamantha
9:20 a.m.
You can just send the user json and only include the attributes you want to change.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 25 June, 2015 1:22:31 AM
Subject: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
Hi Team,
There are situations that we use update user rest API, to update just one
element of user (eg: enabled : false etc.) .
This requires a pre fetched user object from the GET user call, other wise
rest of the user information tend to be truncated after the update call.
Is there a possibility to update only specific elements of the user instead
of sending whole the user object (objective is to avoid the GET call right
before the update call and avoid possible tendency of data truncations )?
Your kind reply is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Chamantha
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
12:18 a.m.
Hi Stain,
Thank you for your response, we are using Keycloak 1.2.0 final and in that version we do
have that problem. If we update only particular element in user update call it will
truncate (turn to default values in some cases eg : boolean).
Best Regards,
Chamantha
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:20:53 -0400
From: stian(a)redhat.com
To: chamantha(a)outlook.com
CC: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
You can just send the user json and only include the attributes you want to change.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
> To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 25 June, 2015 1:22:31 AM
> Subject: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
>
> Hi Team,
>
> There are situations that we use update user rest API, to update just one
> element of user (eg: enabled : false etc.) .
> This requires a pre fetched user object from the GET user call, other wise
> rest of the user information tend to be truncated after the update call.
>
> Is there a possibility to update only specific elements of the user instead
> of sending whole the user object (objective is to avoid the GET call right
> before the update call and avoid possible tendency of data truncations )?
> Your kind reply is highly appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Chamantha
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
1:26 a.m.
Send me the json you're updating with an what fields are changed and I'll look
into it
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2015 7:18:08 AM
Subject: RE: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
Hi Stain,
Thank you for your response, we are using Keycloak 1.2.0 final and in that
version we do have that problem. If we update only particular element in
user update call it will truncate (turn to default values in some cases eg :
boolean).
Best Regards,
Chamantha
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:20:53 -0400
> From: stian(a)redhat.com
> To: chamantha(a)outlook.com
> CC: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
>
> You can just send the user json and only include the attributes you want to
> change.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 25 June, 2015 1:22:31 AM
> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
> >
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > There are situations that we use update user rest API, to update just one
> > element of user (eg: enabled : false etc.) .
> > This requires a pre fetched user object from the GET user call, other
> > wise
> > rest of the user information tend to be truncated after the update call.
> >
> > Is there a possibility to update only specific elements of the user
> > instead
> > of sending whole the user object (objective is to avoid the GET call
> > right
> > before the update call and avoid possible tendency of data truncations )?
> > Your kind reply is highly appreciated.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chamantha
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
9:25 a.m.
Hi Stain,
I included a sample scenario as follows, in that I have updated only one field which is
"enabled" field. But this is common for rest of the fields and attributes as
well.
1. Before the update (test user's original information):
{
"id":"c2279ae4-99b7-403c-9ac7-0ff838ff1b83",
"username":"test-user",
"enabled":true,
"totp":false,
"emailVerified":false,
"firstName":"test",
"lastName":"user",
"email":"test-user@test.com",
"attributes":{
"locality":"Redwood city",
"country":"USA",
"region":"CA",
"postal_code":"94065",
"street":"Holly St"
},
"requiredActions":[
]
}
2. Update user as following :
Update user with just one field
API call : PUT /auth/admin/realms/leapset/users/test-user
Headers :
Accept: application/json
content-type: application/json
Authorization: Bearer TOKEN
Request body :
{"enabled":false}
After the update fields like email, firstname, lastname are missing
{
"id":"c2279ae4-99b7-403c-9ac7-0ff838ff1b83",
"username":"test-user",
"enabled":false,
"totp":false,
"emailVerified":false,
"attributes":{
"locality":"Redwood city",
"country":"USA",
"region":"CA",
"postal_code":"94065",
"street":"Holly St"
},
"requiredActions":[
]
}
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:26:51 -0400
From: stian(a)redhat.com
To: chamantha(a)outlook.com
CC: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
Send me the json you're updating with an what fields are changed and I'll look
into it
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2015 7:18:08 AM
> Subject: RE: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
>
> Hi Stain,
>
> Thank you for your response, we are using Keycloak 1.2.0 final and in that
> version we do have that problem. If we update only particular element in
> user update call it will truncate (turn to default values in some cases eg :
> boolean).
>
> Best Regards,
> Chamantha
>
> > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:20:53 -0400
> > From: stian(a)redhat.com
> > To: chamantha(a)outlook.com
> > CC: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
> >
> > You can just send the user json and only include the attributes you want to
> > change.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chamantha De Silva" <chamantha(a)outlook.com>
> > > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, 25 June, 2015 1:22:31 AM
> > > Subject: [keycloak-user] Update the user only with required fields
> > >
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > There are situations that we use update user rest API, to update just one
> > > element of user (eg: enabled : false etc.) .
> > > This requires a pre fetched user object from the GET user call, other
> > > wise
> > > rest of the user information tend to be truncated after the update call.
> > >
> > > Is there a possibility to update only specific elements of the user
> > > instead
> > > of sending whole the user object (objective is to avoid the GET call
> > > right
> > > before the update call and avoid possible tendency of data truncations )?
> > > Your kind reply is highly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chamantha
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-user mailing list
> > > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
3447
days inactive
3457
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Chamantha De Silva -
Stian Thorgersen