6:06 p.m.
From my understanding Realms allow Keycloak itself to be Multi Tenant,
completely isolated Tenants.
Adding Groups (or Teams/Organisations) would make it easier for Applications leveraging
Keycloak to be Multi Tenanted themselves (within a Realm). While some people seem to be
using Composite roles with great affect, it is probably not what they were intended for.
The biggest benefit of Groups I see is being able to link groups of users to specific data
so that their role only applies to that data and not to everything in the
system/application (e.g. A Group Admin role allows a user permission to administrator only
data created/owned by users in that group).
Cheers,
Nic
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:35:38 -0400
From: Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Keycloak to set up Teams and
Organizations
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <561E764A.4030706(a)redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
That's just not how keycloak was designed.
Realms contain users, applications/clients, roles, groups etc. Realms
were meant to be completely isolated from one another.
On 10/14/2015 10:53 AM, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> The use case for me is to use multiple realms for authentication (e.g.
> one realm for each organisation) that can access a single application
> using a common set of roles.
> Its sort of discussed from a different perspective on the apiman list here:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/apiman-user/2015-October/000361.html
>
> Tim
>
> On 14/10/2015 15:34, Bill Burke wrote:
>> No, we are not creatin "global" groups and roles. use case please?.
>> We're trying to keep realms isolated from one another.
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 7:29 AM, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
>>> The scope of this is presumably groups within an individual realm?
>>> Is there any possibility for "global" groups and roles that can
span
>>> multiple realms?
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 13/10/2015 17:18, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>> You just want something like github groups? List your requirements.
6:23 p.m.
New subject: Keycloak to set up Teams and Organizations
On 10/14/2015 7:06 PM, Nic Grange wrote:
>From my understanding Realms allow Keycloak itself to be Multi
Tenant, completely isolated Tenants.
Exactly.
Adding Groups (or Teams/Organisations) would make it easier for Applications leveraging
Keycloak to be Multi Tenanted themselves (within a Realm). While some people seem to be
using Composite roles with great affect, it is probably not what they were intended for.
The biggest benefit of Groups I see is being able to link groups of users to specific
data so that their role only applies to that data and not to everything in the
system/application (e.g. A Group Admin role allows a user permission to administrator only
data created/owned by users in that group).
I like that idea. A better alternative might be that each group has an
"user-admin" role. If a user has the "user-admin" role of the group,
it
can administer users in that group and assign roles defined in that
group. One thing to really think about is, what about sub-groups. Can
an admin of the parent group administer sub groups?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
3365
days inactive
3365
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bill Burke -
Nic Grange