<span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12px">‌</span>Hi,<br> I want to protect a high-level risk feature with 2FA. Historically, we use<br> 2FA SMS. I want to propose the same feature but ideally,&nbsp; I wish to be able<br> to integrate also native Keycloak OTP authenticator (more secure).<br> That' s why based on&nbsp; keycloak-sms-authenticator-sns &lt;http://<br> <a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=htt... href="https://github.com/nickpack/keycloak-sms-authenticator-sns" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/nickpack/<wbr>keycl... <div class="a3s aXjCH m162198d296a41d54" id=":g7"><wbr>&gt;&nbsp; , I have<br> improved this authenticator ( here<br> &lt;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=htt... href="https://github.com/malys/keycloak-sms-authenticator-sns/tree/f... rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/malys/<wbr>keycloak... ).<br> <br> I have searched in Keycloak 3.4.3 documentation but using the same realm, I<br> haven't seen any feature to ask 2FA when the final user want to access to a<br> specific resource.<br> Role mechanism allows managing access (403 - 200) but it seems that it isn't<br> cover my use case.<br> I 'm not sure that UMA 2.0 could be offering this feature. Moreover, It<br> isn't yet implemented.<br> Level of assurance seems very well but it isn't yet implemented and it would<br> be difficult to do it.<br> <br> I could include a servlet filter on the business application (JBoss adapter)<br> to route user to 2FA authenticator when he wants to access the resource.<br> But in this case, I have to propagate a state between Keycloak and Java<br> adapter to not ask 2FA code for each access.<br> It could be a little bit tricky in cluster mode (stateless service).<br> <br> Below, I describe the use case.<br> <br> &lt;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=htt... href="http://keycloak-user.88327.x6.nabble.com/file/t611/2FA_resourc... rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://keycloak-user.88327.<wbr>x6.nab... <br> <br> Have you any idea to cover this use case easily based on native keycloak<br> features?<br> If that isn't the case, in your opinion, what is the best solution (see<br> above)? (easiest integration for maintainability, clustering support and 2FA<br> technic agnostic)<br> <br> Thank you for sharing your experience.</div>