Author: marius.bogoevici
Date: 2009-12-18 18:35:47 -0500 (Fri, 18 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 5358
Modified:
cdi-tck/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java
Log:
CDITCK-87. Relax the test for the Decorators (if the bean implements a sub-interface of
Decorator, the test based on getInterfaces() may fail).
Modified:
cdi-tck/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java
===================================================================
---
cdi-tck/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java 2009-12-18
09:38:41 UTC (rev 5357)
+++
cdi-tck/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java 2009-12-18
23:35:47 UTC (rev 5358)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
boolean implementsInterface = false;
for (Class<?> interfaze : decorators.get(0).getClass().getInterfaces())
{
- if (interfaze.equals(Decorator.class))
+ if (Decorator.class.isAssignableFrom(interfaze))
{
implementsInterface = true;
break;
Show replies by date