]
Ondrej Zizka commented on WELD-900:
-----------------------------------
Errata (since I can't edit comments):
a) @Named ... explained >>, or there should be a link to an explanation<<.
"I don't think that assuming all readers are familiar with the use of
interceptors >>is appropriate.<<"
Docs: Improve Weld reference. Make it less poetic and more
structured.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WELD-900
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-900
Project: Weld
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
Assignee: Pete Muir
It's nice to have a nice text for a DZone article, but for a reference documentation,
we should favor briefness and structure over potential nomination for Man Booker
International Prize :)
What I mean is, e.g., if someone starts with Weld, he needs steps 1., 2., 3.
IMO, this should be in **bold** in a special chapter called "Preparing project to
use Weld", with a sample code which is verified to work if copied and run, and
eventually a reference to a quick-start app:
{quote}
There's just little one thing you need to do before you can start injecting them into
stuff: you need to put them in an archive (a jar, or a Java EE module such as a war or EJB
jar) that contains a special marker file: META-INF/beans.xml.
{quote}
In contrast, currently this most important information is buried at the end of last
paragraph of irrelevantly sounding chapter, "1.1. What is a bean?". Why would
anyone read "What is a bean"?
my2p, ymmv
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: