[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-335) RIBean needs new definition of equality

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Stuart Douglas commented on WELD-335: ------------------------------------- It should be possible to keep the simple id's if the bean is vetoed, however it probably would not be pretty. Also if a bean was vetoed and then two different beans of the same class type were added through the SPI then you could not use the simple id, as it would be random as which one get the simple id an which one gets the complex one. The id's for producer fields etc still have to be fixed up in a similar manner. After thinking about it a bit more complex id should probably only include annotations that have meaning to weld. I have a portable extension that adds a Synthetic bean id annotation to it's AnnotatedTypes, so it can identify them in the ProcessInjectionTarget event. This approach now breaks replication, as the synthetic Id's are non deterministic. This is probably not something that many people will run into, so I don't know if we should worry about it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira