[JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-249) Incorrect specialization in org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
1:42 p.m.
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the testcase
is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12:48 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Martin Kouba commented on CDITCK-249:
-------------------------------------
I don't see any BuildingImpl in the test.
Building is SFSB and its bean types are BuildingLocal and java.lang.Object. Office bean
types are OfficeLocal, BuildingLocal and java.lang.Object.
*3.2.2. Bean types of a session bean*: The unrestricted set of bean types for a session
bean contains all local interfaces of the bean and their superinterfaces.
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:07 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Jozef Hartinger commented on CDITCK-249:
----------------------------------------
Sorry, I meant to write BuildingLocal. Office does not directly implement BuildingLocal
nor does OfficeLocal extend it. Therefore, I am not sure if BuildingLocal is a bean type
of Office.
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:15 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Jozef Hartinger commented on CDITCK-249:
----------------------------------------
The fact that BuildingLocal is not a bean type of Office is implied by the fact that
BuildingLocal is not a client view of Office. See the EJB 3.1 spec section 4.9.2.1
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:15 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Jozef Hartinger edited comment on CDITCK-249 at 12/7/11 3:15 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that BuildingLocal is not a bean type of Office is implied by the fact that
BuildingLocal is not a local interface of Office. See the EJB 3.1 spec section 4.9.2.1
was (Author: jharting):
The fact that BuildingLocal is not a bean type of Office is implied by the fact that
BuildingLocal is not a client view of Office. See the EJB 3.1 spec section 4.9.2.1
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
7:41 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Martin Kouba commented on CDITCK-249:
-------------------------------------
You're right.
Fixed in this way: OfficeLocal extends BuildingLocal
Also added new TCK test:
*org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.simple.broken.types.SpecializingBeanWithoutBeanTypeOfSpecializedBeanTest*
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:18 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Martin Kouba resolved CDITCK-249.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Done
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
4747
days inactive
4748
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Jozef Hartinger (Commented) (JIRA) -
Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)
-
Jozef Hartinger (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)
-
Martin Kouba (Commented) (JIRA)
-
Martin Kouba (Resolved) (JIRA)