[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys...
]
Pete Muir updated CDI-70:
-------------------------
Description:
I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the
AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all. If the
parameters for a method or a constructor don't match the underlying class, it should
be considered a definition error.
was:
I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the
AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all.
Clarify that if an extension provides an Annotated* then it is
considered "metadata complete"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-70
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Pete Muir
I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the
AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all. If the
parameters for a method or a constructor don't match the underlying class, it should
be considered a definition error.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira