Re: [wildfly-dev] Enhancing the HTTP Management Interface Configuration - WFLY-2635
I don't believe we want to require SSO out of the box. That would be too much
infrastructure for a simple setup.
On May 2, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Heiko Braun <hbraun(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
If i understand it correctly, the new auth method you mention has no relation to sso (the
brno design decisions, right?). Maybe its worth exploring the commonalities and
differences to see if we can move to keycloak right away? Assuming that we dont wont two
pssible authentication options. The way i see it keycloak sso would be a replacement for
the new auth method you desribe, right?
Heiko
> Am 01.05.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com>:
>
> I will send round some design ideas / config examples next week but if
> there are any additional demands on the HTTP management interface in
> addition to a path to enabling alternative distribution approaches and
> the enablement of SSO not is the time to speak up ;-)
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev