To close the loop on this thread... I merged Emmanuel's PR.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:10 AM Andrew Taylor <ataylor(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Makes sense to me thanks for the info
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 17:05, Brian Stansberry <
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> It seems Emmanuel thinks we should do this.
>
>
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/16166
>
> ;-)
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:58 AM Brian Stansberry <
> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Emmanuel (and anyone),
>>
>> WDYT about going back to not having the embedded broker in the OOTB
>> configs in WildFly Preview 27? (Or perhaps 28.) It got restored this summer
>> during the big-bang work in order to make that work easier, but not having
>> it OOTB in WFP was a conscious decision about how we thought
>> forward-looking users should look at things. (Using the embedded broker was
>> still possible, with an example config to illustrate how to set it up; it
>> just wasn't in the standard configs.)
>>
>> We've never done a .Final WFP release with an embedded broker in the
>> standard configs, so if we think we shouldn't have that it's better IMHO
to
>> get rid of it before WF 27 Final.
>>
>> I *think* removing it again would be pretty straightforward. The biggest
>> pain associated with not having it was needing to exclude a lot of tests
>> when WFP was used, but I think those exclusions are mostly still there.
>>
>> There's a JIRA for this (
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-16714)
>> that I've just now scheduled for 27.0.0.Final. That scheduling is just so
>> it appears on my radar screen for WF 27; it's not a demand that we do it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Brian
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
> He/Him/His
>