On 11/19/15 10:07 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
On 19/11/15 15:50, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Darran's the expert on this, but my initial naive question is whether
> this can be split into two logical use cases:
>
> 1) Where we know TLS is not going to be used on the HC<->server
> connection.
>
> 2) Where we don't know that.
>
> I ask because if case 2 is harder or requires changes that don't belong
> in a micro release (e.g. management model changes) perhaps we can first
> deal with case 1. My impression from the initial bug report is that
> SSL/TLS was not configured on the host's management interfaces.
To get to the error in the bug report the underlying user has taken
these two steps: -
1 - Configure the JVM to be FIPS Compliant.
2 - Start a default domain configuration.
They have experienced the error and reported it to us.
I would be very surprised if they were not planning to subsequently
enable TLS for the remote communication with the HostController.
I can't say I disagree. :)
I suppose at a push master may have no application server instances
but
have TLS enable for remote communication and the individual slave host
controllers only bind management to loopback so don't enable TLS.
With WildFly 9/10 the intra-domain comms can be running on a completely
separate network from non-management stuff, so the possibility that
traffic doesn't use TLS is a bit greater. But still not likely. In
earlier versions this kind of setup is harder since CLI would talk to
the DC over the same interface intra-domain comms use. With WF 9/10 the
CLI could use HTTP Upgrade to talk to the DC on one network while
intra-domain comms are on another network using the old native interface.
>
> On 11/19/15 4:25 AM, Ryan Emerson wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Currently domain mode is unable to execute when the JVM has FIPS
>> enabled. See [1] for example config files and the resulting stacktrace.
>>
>> I am looking into this issue (SET engineer), however my current
>> knowledge of core and FIPS is limited. What are your thoughts on how
>> to implement FIPS compatibility? Is there any fundamental reasons why
>> such a feature shouldn't be supported?
>>
>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1135
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ryan
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat