At this point we have 2 open bugs that we need to fix. Unfortunately we
have roughly 28 open challenges with Oracle for bad TCK tests. The plan is
to release a Beta once the 2 bugs are fixed. I won't release a Final until
we get the certification from Oracle, which means waiting for all of these
challenges to be resolved. I don't have to tell anyone here the
"quickness" of getting fixes for these challenges.
So define "ready" :)
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:02 AM Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If hibernate 5.3 is ready and JPA 2.2 passes TCK, than we could
probably
bring it in.
Aa we do want to add more and more EE8 features, but only if they are
ready.
So if you feel that JPA 2.2 impl is ready than please go ahead and send PR
for upgrade to 5.3 (given all other conditions for merging are met).
But if you think you cannot get it done in about a month(more or less)
than it would need to be postponed for WF13.
And we need to consider what to do to make WF12 JPA impl work work on
JDK9, aka upgrade the javasssit.
--
tomaz
*From: *Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
*Sent: *sreda, 06. december 2017 12:29
*To: *Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
*Cc: *Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>; Tomaž Cerar
<tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com>; wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
*Subject: *Re: [wildfly-dev] WildFly 11 and JDK9
If y'all are willing to pull in Hibernate 5.3 the plan is to switch
Hibernate to use ByteBuddy as It's default provider for byte code
enhancement services rather than Javassist.
5.3 however is our JPA 2.2 (ee8) work, so that has to be factored into the
decision. 2.2 adds some new classes that we do rely on code-wise -
@TableGenerators and @SequenceGenerators. Because of this we cannot simply
use 5.3 "under" the JPA 2.1 jar
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017, 7:22 PM Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
There's a Javassist 3.22.0-GA out and we've moved on to WF 12 work. What
are we going to do about this one?
We don't expect a long dev cycle for WF 12 so if we are going to make this
change we shouldn't delay long. We don't want to try it and see right
before the release.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
I guess we'd have to TIAS. Generally history tells us that these
Javassist updates do not go smoothly for Hibernate/WF. However, at least
part of purpose of this 3.22 release was for Hibernate and Java 9:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261
Back then I was able to use those 3.22 snapshots successfully, so
hopefully this upgrade should go smoothly. But I agree that I would feel
more comfortable with a Final rather than a CR.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:14 AM Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I think its probably too late, but I think we can follow up with an 11.1
or 11.0.1 that includes Java 9 fixes.
I suspect we probably won’t have everything even if we did update
Javassist (still some test failures etc).
If someone has a strong argument otherwise, speak now or forever hold your
peace!
On Aug 31, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey guys,
during development of WF11 we have done lots of work on making it build &
run on JDK9.
as release nears I would like to summarize what the current state is and
how to move on.
Currently most of our core [1] & full [2] testsuite passes on latest
builds of JDK9.
Remaining failures are already addressed by [3] and [4]
**But** passing testsuite on JDK9 is not the same as using our binary
distribution under JDK9.
Currently as part of running build / testsuite we override version of
javassit to 3.22.0-CR2
which is currently the only version that works properly on JDK9.
As there is no .GA version of javassit that work on JDK9 avalible we
currently do not have it as default.
On top of that, hibernate as main user of javassit is not tested enough
with this version of javassist
unless hibernate / JPA team says otherwise.
That would in practice mean that users running WF11 on JDK9 would have
issues with JPA/Hibernate
based applications.
Currently I see two options how to address this:
- upgrade javassist to 3.22.x in server, preferably ask for .GA release.
- produce additional WildFly.x.x.x-jdk9 zip that would include the newer
javassist.
So question is do we even want to have working JDK9 build of WildFly 11
.Final
or should we postpone this for next update release.
--
tomaz
[1]
https://ci.wildfly.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=WildFlyCore_MasterLinuxJdk9
[2]
https://ci.wildfly.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=WF_MasterLinuxJdk9ea
[3]
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/2738
[4]
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/2751
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
Chief Architect, JBoss EAP
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat