Re: [wildfly-dev] Return types of i18n logging methods and their "equality" expectations
Not that wouldn't work. Each invocation of fooBar() will return a new
instance of SomeException.
Why not just do
try {
doSomething();
} catch (SomeException e) {
// handle
} catch (Exception e) {
// do something else
}
On 04/27/2013 06:17 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I have a interface annotated with @MessageBundle which has a method:
@Message(id = xxxx, value = "No param message")
SomeException fooBar();
So the method expects no format params for the log message and returns a
"SomeException" type. Assuming some piece of code then uses this logging
method to do:
throw fooBar();
is it fine to expect that if the caller does:
try {
...
doSomething();
} catch (Exception e) {
// is this fine to do?
if (e.equals(fooBar()) {
// do some other thing
}
}
I think the equals and even == would work for the no param logger
method, but is this considered as relying/guessing about the
implementation details or is this fine to do?
-Jaikiran
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat