On 14/09/16 11:24, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
On 14/09/16 09:54, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> Well, it is a protocol operation which has a management side-effect. The
> way we have approached that in other similar situations is to either
> require access through a loopback interface or require authentication
> and authorization be enabled on the endpoint and an Admin permission on
> the subject requesting the operation. Note however that the Hot Rod
> endpoint would be using a different security realm compared to the
> management one.
FYI for WildFly 11 if a call remains in-VM and goes from the application
to the management tier we will have a mechanism for the identity to be
inflowed to the security domain used for management which will allow
management access control to be used.
That would require the identity to be present
in both "security realms"
(or whatever their equivalent is in WF11) ?
Tristan
--
Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat