My personal opinion on this, is that we should not ship two implementations. I know this
is in the community, so it doesn't cause any issue with support as we don't have
to ship both in EAP. Having said that, if people in the community adopt MyFaces, and then
move to EAP, and its not there, its just another thing that causes a problem for adoption
of EAP.
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: ssilvert(a)redhat.com
To: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 11:31:27 AM
Subject: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
Ever since we switched from MyFaces to Mojarra I've incurred the
wrath
of MyFaces fans. Regardless of the relative quality of each
implementation, we have stuck with Mojarra because it always
implements
the latest spec long before MyFaces. Now is no exception as Mojarra
fully supports JSF 2.2 and MyFaces 2.2 is incomplete.
However, with Multi-JSF in place, it is now trivial to ship both
implementations and allow the end user to choose which one they like
best.
Any thoughts on this?
Stan
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev