Re: [wildfly-dev] smaller footprints
On 03/04/2014 11:05 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 3/4/2014 11:39 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> You might want to look at the work described in
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODULES-146 which essentially would let
> you keep your modules directory completely remote on a server, with
> local caching, if you wanted to.
>
For distributing jars, I like the artifact approach better as you don't
have to maintain two types of repos. You can use a maven repo for both
building apps and running Wildfly. I can't remember exactly, but the
full size of all module.xml files in a Wildfly distro was 200-800k after
you strip out all the comments.
It is possible that you misunderstood me. It's not necessarily
one-or-the-other; you could have the remote repository hold the module
descriptors which are downloaded on demand. That will save you even
more space and you don't even have to strip out comments.
Other thoughts however will come on another branch.
--
- DML