Interesting.
Why couldn't that be deployed? Doing so from the RESTEasy build probably
isn't good, but a branch in
with just pom like
you have seems reasonable. It's just a different way of getting the source,
and is analogous to what WildFly is doing with all our
ee-9/source-transform modules.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:26 PM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is technically allowed, but this does seem
to work
https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3039. A pseudo fork so to speak.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:44 AM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:39 AM Brian Stansberry <
> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:18 AM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh sorry, my mistake :) I would guess
>>>
https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jakarta-jaxrs-api_spec and each other
>>> spec likely has one there with a few exceptions. If you need access to the
>>> repository just let me know.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:12 AM Scott Stark <sstark(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Into which JBoss org are we forking these jakartaee and eclipse-ee4j
>>>> repos is the question?
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 3, 2022 at 10:58:03 AM, James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For Jakarta REST it's
https://github.com/jakartaee/rest. If
everyone
>>>>> else agrees with doing this I'm happy to get a full list together
for the
>>>>> ones in question. If we want to just test with one first though
I'm happy
>>>>> to have RESTEasy be the tester.
>>>>>
>>>>
>> I added a column to
>>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ql5hpsqs5ZjawErhyVQX8idigFfm0uZZx....
>> Let's track data there. If people want write access please ping me with the
>> google account to use.
>>
>> I don't think we should do these unless the people driving our
>> integration of a spec ask. We shouldn't spend time producing forks/releases
>> if there won't be much benefit.
>>
>
> I guess "benefit" is somewhat relative. There is definitely a cost to
> using the forked version. It requires the time to handle it and brings the
> question of "how often do we rebase?". What RESTEasy is doing does work.
> However, as I said it's polluting the local repository of anyone that
> builds RESTEasy's main branch.
>
> One option I've thought of, but haven't tested, was to see if there is a
> way with the maven-scm-plugin and the org.codehaus.mojo plugin to create a
> fork during the build. I can have a look at this as it seems easier at
> least than fully forking a repository. We wouldn't deploy these artifacts
> into Nexus, but they could at least be used for local testing without
> polluting the local repository.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:54 AM Scott Stark <sstark(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can take it on since this impacts our getting WildFly
certified
>>>>>> for EE10. What GitHub org would I use for these forked repos?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> James R. Perkins
>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
>> He/Him/His
>>
>
>
> --
> James R. Perkins
> JBoss by Red Hat
>
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat