If you're using maven you could download the wildfly-dist ZIP and unzip
it into a directory. This would have the advantage of using the correct
target runtime you're using too.
Example:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unpack-wildfly</id>
<phase>process-test-classes</phase>
<goals>
<goal>unpack</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<artifactItems>
<artifactItem>
<groupId>org.wildfly</groupId>
<artifactId>wildfly-dist</artifactId>
<version>${version.org.wildfly.dist}</version>
<type>zip</type>
<!-- overwrite to clean any previous
deployments -->
<overWrite>true</overWrite>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}</outputDirectory>
</artifactItem>
</artifactItems>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
On 04/30/2015 10:57 AM, Daniel Kreuter wrote:
Hi,
> Am 30.04.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Brian Stansberry
> <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>>:
>
>
> [
1]http://wildfly.org/news/2015/03/13/Offline-CLI/
>
>> Question is, should be embedded arquillian container still available for
>> 9.x?
>>
>
> Jason Greene would need to rule on that, but I know we were ok with
> dropping it before. Is there much use of it?
One thing I use the embedded module is for our jenkins build because
we have no access to a managed or remote WildFly instance on that
machine, so yeah I would like to see a working plugin for future
versions of WildFly, otherwise I either need to drop my integration
tests or stick with 8.2 instead.
Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat