----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Stansberry"
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
To: "Tomaž Cerar" <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 12:50:29 AM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Improve query() operation for complex attributes?
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:23 PM, James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Ah, I see. Sorry for the confusion. It might be possible with that dot
> notation. You could file a JIRA and someone can look at it when there is
> time. It does seem possible though.
>
>
> As long as query op uses :read-attribute / :read-resource for its work than
> dot notation should work just fine
>
It doesn’t.
WFCORE RFE Jiras for this should probably be split in two, as the request for
dealing with child resources is significantly more complex. The dot notation
isn’t currently applied to children anywhere.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2041 is created for improvement of query in complex
attributes
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2042 is created for improvement of query in nested
child resources
The dot notation should apply for attribute names[1], if the dot does not work for
resource names,
maybe another parameter like: 'separator' can be added to query() operation to
specify one.
[1]
https://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/2015-June/001158.html
Best Regards
--
Lin Gao
Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev