Re: [wildfly-dev] Wildfly layers

Do you mean Elytron or the Elytron Subsystem? I believe yes the subsystem does have that dependency but it is only temporary until PicketBox is removed. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM Jean-Francois Denise <jdenise(a)redhat.com <mailto:jdenise@redhat.com>> wrote: Darran, elytron seems to have a dependency on picketbox for jacc support. Am I right? On 05/12/2018 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote: > Yes we can remove it entirely ;-) > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf(a)redhat.com > <mailto:cdewolf@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote: >> >> Picketbox layer >> >> Because we want at some point to get rid-off this >> dependency, I am >> wandering if we should really define a layer for it. >> Could be that any >> dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security >> layer. Picketbox >> is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned. >> >> >> The independent use is the management vault. Using that >> shouldn't require everything in the current p-b module >> though. And arguably you could say that use case means you >> need the vault tool and thus whatever layer has it. (You >> don't need the vault tool though, not on the server.) >> > Can we change the management vault somehow to not need > PicketBox at all anymore? > > Carlo > _______________________________________________ > wildfly-dev mailing list > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >