Re: [wildfly-dev] Updating the WildFly archetypes

Hi Eduardo, while building a "wildfly-javaee-webapp-archetype", I think I found a small WildFly issue: you remember that you pointed me to the fact that "beans.xml" is optional? But when creating a blank project from my new web archetype (which defines a "faces-config.xml", but no "beans.xml"), the attached error is in the WildFly console. But it seems the app is deployed anyway. The error disappears if I add e.g. an annotated EJB, or if I add a "beans.xml". Do you think this is a WildFly bug? Or should I add a default "beans.xml" just to avoid this error? I did not test it with a blank project from the EAR archetype - will do this in the next few days. Best regards Wolfgang Am 03.06.19 um 21:36 schrieb Wolfgang Knauf: > Thanks for the deploy, Eduardo! > > If you consider it reasonable I will create an archetype for "web app > only", similar to the old "wildfly-javaee7-webapp-archetype". > But I will probably need a few weeks... > > What happens to the old archetype > "wildfly-javaee7-webapp-ear-archetype"? It could be deleted, as it > does not build anyway. It might be relevant only for research. > > Best regards > > Wolfgang > > > > Am 03.06.19 um 17:05 schrieb Brian Stansberry: >> Excellent!  Thank you so much Wolfgang! >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:52 AM Eduardo Martins <emartins(a)redhat.com >> <mailto:emartins@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >>     Wolfgang: yours and mine PRs are merged, and when WFLY 17 Final is >>     out I will also deploy the archetype, thanks a lot for your >>     contribution! Yet now I have to ask, do you plan to submit similar >>     for the other old javaee archetype? :-) >> >>     Brian: yep it was just the JDK, I will deploy these too (no planned >>     updates in such code tho) >> >>     —E >> >>>     On 16 May 2019, at 10:09, Eduardo Martins <emartins(a)redhat.com >>>     <mailto:emartins@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>>     Hmm ok, maybe it just failed build due to some specific like JDK >>>     11, will recheck that. >>> >>>     —E >>> >>>>     On 16 May 2019, at 02:25, Brian Stansberry >>>>     <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com >>>>     <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>     These build for me. >>>> >>>>     They're not as out of date as I'd thought either. >>>> >>>>     On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:34 PM Eduardo Martins >>>>     <emartins(a)redhat.com <mailto:emartins@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>         If you think it’s not a small effort task then certainly >>>>         agree that’s not a blocker, I look at the archetypes same way >>>>         as the quickstarts,  an aggregation project, so we may take >>>>         outdated/faulty ones out of build and release the >>>>         working+actual ones. We may give it a thought later if it >>>>         makes sense effort wise to update or drop the subsystem ones, >>>>         no worries. >>>> >>>>         —E >>>>