midnight
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the quick response. I tried this using a separate Keycloak
1.7.0 server and am encountering errors that, after debugging thru the
Keycloak OAuth flow, seem linked to the use of the earlier version of the
Keycloak adapter which is bundled with APIMan 1.1.9. Do you have an
planned release date for a Keycloak 1.7.0 compatible version of APIMan?
Continued successful integration between these two projects is a big
benefit.
If try to use APIMan 1.1.9 with the Keycloak 1.7.0 adapter for Wildfly, I
encounter a problem in
io.apiman.manager.ui.server.wildfly8,KeyCloakBearerTokenGenerator where the
use of:
org.keycloak.util.Time,getTime()
errors out at runtime with ClassNotFoundException as this class was dropped
from the Keycloak 1.7.0 API.
Thanks again.
Guy
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
This is absolutely possible. Have a look through the production
guide and
see if it helps:
http://www.apiman.io/latest/production-guide.html
If you continue to have issues let us know so that we can update the
guide. We already have at least one update to make:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/APIMAN-842
-Eric
On 12/17/2015 3:48 PM, Guy Davis wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I currently have a test instance of Wildfly 9 running both Keycloak 1.5
> and Apiman 1.1.8. I'm using Keycloak 1.5 as Apiman makes a Keycloak
> getTime() call somewhere that was removed in Keycloak 1.6's adapters.
>
> So I'm seeing that trying to put Keycloak and Apiman in the same Wildfly
> container is probably not a good plan going forward due to
> incompatibilities as each project progresses.
>
> Today, I noticed that Hawkular announced
> <
> http://www.hawkular.org/blog/2015/12/16/hawkular-1.0.0.Alpha8-released.html
> >
> that they now allow startup of their container with a property pointing
> to a remote Keycloak server.
>
> Is this possible with Apiman today? If not, is it on the roadmap? I'd
> like to upgrade to Keycloak 1.7
> <http://blog.keycloak.org/2015/12/keycloak-170final-released.html>
> following
> this approach with Keycloak, Apiman, and Hawkular all in their own
> containers.
>
> By the way, I'm really stoked to see the excellent integration and
> progress being made by all these projects! Keep up the good work.
>
> Thanks,
> Guy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Apiman-user mailing list
> Apiman-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-user
>
>