Good day, I currently have a test instance of Wildfly 9 running both Keycloak 1.5 and Apiman 1.1.8. I'm using Keycloak 1.5 as Apiman makes a Keycloak getTime() call somewhere that was removed in Keycloak 1.6's adapters. So I'm seeing that trying to put Keycloak and Apiman in the same Wildfly container is probably not a good plan going forward due to incompatibilities as each project progresses. Today, I noticed that Hawkular announced <http://www.hawkular.org/blog/2015/12/16/hawkular-1.0.0.Alpha8-released.ht... that they now allow startup of their container with a property pointing to a remote Keycloak server. Is this possible with Apiman today? If not, is it on the roadmap? I'd like to upgrade to Keycloak 1.7 <http://blog.keycloak.org/2015/12/keycloak-170final-released.html> following this approach with Keycloak, Apiman, and Hawkular all in their own containers. By the way, I'm really stoked to see the excellent integration and progress being made by all these projects! Keep up the good work. Thanks, Guy _______________________________________________ Apiman-user mailing list Apiman-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-user

Hi Eric, Thanks for the quick response. I tried this using a separate Keycloak 1.7.0 server and am encountering errors that, after debugging thru the Keycloak OAuth flow, seem linked to the use of the earlier version of the Keycloak adapter which is bundled with APIMan 1.1.9. Do you have an planned release date for a Keycloak 1.7.0 compatible version of APIMan? Continued successful integration between these two projects is a big benefit. If try to use APIMan 1.1.9 with the Keycloak 1.7.0 adapter for Wildfly, I encounter a problem in io.apiman.manager.ui.server.wildfly8,KeyCloakBearerTokenGenerator where the use of: org.keycloak.util.Time,getTime() errors out at runtime with ClassNotFoundException as this class was dropped from the Keycloak 1.7.0 API. Thanks again. Guy On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann(a)redhat.com <mailto:eric.wittmann@redhat.com>> wrote: This is absolutely possible. Have a look through the production guide and see if it helps: http://www.apiman.io/latest/production-guide.html If you continue to have issues let us know so that we can update the guide. We already have at least one update to make: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/APIMAN-842 -Eric On 12/17/2015 3:48 PM, Guy Davis wrote: Good day, I currently have a test instance of Wildfly 9 running both Keycloak 1.5 and Apiman 1.1.8. I'm using Keycloak 1.5 as Apiman makes a Keycloak getTime() call somewhere that was removed in Keycloak 1.6's adapters. So I'm seeing that trying to put Keycloak and Apiman in the same Wildfly container is probably not a good plan going forward due to incompatibilities as each project progresses. Today, I noticed that Hawkular announced <http://www.hawkular.org/blog/2015/12/16/hawkular-1.0.0.Alpha8-released.ht... that they now allow startup of their container with a property pointing to a remote Keycloak server. Is this possible with Apiman today? If not, is it on the roadmap? I'd like to upgrade to Keycloak 1.7 <http://blog.keycloak.org/2015/12/keycloak-170final-released.html> following this approach with Keycloak, Apiman, and Hawkular all in their own containers. By the way, I'm really stoked to see the excellent integration and progress being made by all these projects! Keep up the good work. Thanks, Guy _______________________________________________ Apiman-user mailing list Apiman-user(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:Apiman-user@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-user