3:03 p.m.
On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 03:12:09 PM Michael Burman wrote:
Hi,
Why? More repositories is good. If something can be split to new
repositories, it should be done (like the rxjava-cassandra-stuff from
metrics).
Twitter, Google, Facebook and others may disagree with you with their
"monorepo" approach to development (a term I learned today :) ).
I'm not sure how they manage to a) have everything in 1 repo and b) have
independently versioned artifacts without it being exactly the same pain as it
is with multiple repos, but there must be something to it (like
http://danluu.com/monorepo/ or http://www.pantsbuild.org/why_use_pants.html).
I'm a fan of granularity btw and I don't think we'd see much benefit in
merging the repos unless we release all the components at the same time (which
I don't think is a good idea).
What could be advantage of pushing alerts stuff to the
metrics-repository?
I don't see much of a benefit there either...
- Micke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Heiko W.Rupp" <hrupp(a)redhat.com>
To: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
<hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:10:00 PM
Subject: [Hawkular-dev] Collapsing of Repos ?
Hi,
we do have a larger number of repositories and source trees.
Now that we have narrowed down the scope of our work a bit and also
have an idea of what we need for the "core services" package, I wonder
if we can collapse repositories and source trees into larger ones.
As an example: alerts and metrics could go together into
hawkular-metrics and the forwarding of data to alerts could be
done with Java method invocation.
What else could be done here?
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
--
Lukas Krejci