Hawkular Services should indeed be the default choice, we heard of multiple
(potential) users of Hawkular Metrics asking about alerts and/or inventory
support... Metrics is the fallback if one happen to only use metrics. At
least the message of Hawkular Metrics is simple, it's a TSDB, period.
I'm fine leaving the 3 top level projects, and it should definitely not
grow.
Note that I didn't expose Alerts there to not add confusion even though it
can run on its own.
Thomas
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Thomas
Think it looks fine - as long as we are not going to be providing any more
distributions (e.g. Metrics + Alerts) - otherwise it will be extending the
top level menu.
Apologies if already discussed, but just wanted to clarify the purpose of
having Metrics as separate distribution on the community project website.
I understand that Metrics is used as a standalone component within
openshift, but wondering whether that means it should be publicly available
as such on the hawkular website, encouraging other community users to use
it as a separate component.
Wondering whether for simplicity, it would be better to only provide
hawkular-services distribution publicly, even if user only wants metrics,
and then the Metrics build is just an internal packaging option provided to
Openshift?
Regards
Gary
----- Original Message -----
> Thanks for the comments, I'm really looking more for feedback on the
> organization of the content, all the content is taken from the existing.
>
> For the 3rd point, the current website has 2 very similar pages (I only
> conserved one here as it was a quick shot, but the 2 needs to be merged)
>
http://www.hawkular.org/community/index.html
>
http://www.hawkular.org/community/join.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Alissa Bonas < abonas(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
>
>
>
> Couple of suggestions:
>
> 1. In the "Hawkular features" section in homepage make the icons
clickable.
> right now the only way to get more info is to click the "more" part.
> 2. Top level menu font color is a really pale grey so everything looks
> disabled.
> 3. Community-Connect leads to page named "Join". Perhaps it would more
clear
> to make the link and the page name the same (and I would call it "Get
> involved" anyway)
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Heute < theute(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
>
>
>
> So here is a very rough idea of how it would look like:
>
http://209.132.178.114:10188/
>
> Content need to be adapted, new pages to be created, but hopefully you
get
> the idea
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:27 PM, John Sanda < jsanda(a)redhat.com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Thomas Segismont < tsegismo(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 05/07/2016 à 16:05, Stefan Negrea a écrit :
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Segismont < tsegismo(a)redhat.com
> < mailto:tsegismo@redhat.com >> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 05/07/2016 à 14:59, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> 2) The Grafana plugin should be moved under Metrics because is for
Metrics
>
>
> and only Metrics.
> If this is true - can we make it work with H-services as well?
>
>
> The Grafana plugin works with all active flavors of Metrics: standalone,
> Openshift-Metrics and Hawkular-Services.
>
> I'm not sure what Stefan meant.
>
>
> The Grafana plugins works with Metrics deployed on all distributions
> however, the plugin itself can only be used with the Metrics project,
> there are no projects (such as Alerts, or Inventory) that will ever
> integrate with it. That is why I think it should be under the Metrics
> project and not in another place. The integration itself is very
> specific to just Metrics, not the entire Hawkular Services.
>
> I see what you meant now. But we can't presume anything about other
> services roadmaps. For example, the datasource plugin annotation feature
> could be implemented with requests to an event service.
>
> Anyway, since it should be able to connect to Metrics in different
> environments (H-Services, OS-Metrics and standalone), I err on the side
> of promoting it as a top level project.
>
>
> I think a top-level project makes the most sense.
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev