Re: [Hawkular-dev] communty distribution question
On 29.04.2016 14:49, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
On 29 Apr 2016, at 13:41, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
> In the end, what people will see after this 5 minutes test is not what
> Hawkular is.
So the clear suggestion and opinion here is to remove everything
that is not absolutely required by the ManageIQ integration?
Might be, I don't know. Here we cycle back to the question about the
purpose. What's Hawkular's purpose? If our purpose is to "provide
Middleware management to ManageIQ", then why not. There are so many
interesting things to be done at Middleware management that it's a shame
we'd spend so much time on other non-core stuff...
- Juca.