Re: [Hawkular-dev] communty distribution question
On 29 Apr 2016, at 14:49, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
On 29 Apr 2016, at 13:41, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
> In the end, what people will see after this 5 minutes test is not what
> Hawkular is.
So the clear suggestion and opinion here is to remove everything
that is not absolutely required by the ManageIQ integration?
And going forward with this, as we only have 2 use cases going forward.
- support ManageIQ
- support Hawkular-Metrics
Can we collapse the source into one or two source trees to save on
all the integration / release / ... efforts?
With the above there is no point in having any general purpose
setup anymore.