Minimum dependencies is definitely something that matters. (Security, productization...).
Since jackson is already used and productized, there is definitely a strong advantage to
use that one over gson.
Thomas
On 06/24/2015 01:48 PM, Lucas Ponce wrote:
Hello,
As an implementation detail, we are using two libraries to serialize/deserialize with
JSON.
For REST endpoints we are using mainly jackson library as it's packaged with RESTEasy
implementation.
For BUS and other scenarios (like alert engine), we are using gson library.
Does it make sense to unify them ?
I have an scenario where I would like to use a class used as data in REST endpoints as
payload of a BUS message, and I need to deal with some duplication on json
serialization/deserialization tasks.
Perhaps there are good reason to maintain both and that's the best answer but I'm
not sure and I wanted to start a discussion around it.
Thanks,
Lucas
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev