ManageIQ has the notion of "Zone" which is also used to group servers.
I.e.: Zone "Default" has 1 EVM Server, 2 Providers, etc.
Sometimes when I'm cathing up with ManageIQ code I wonder if our tenant concept in
Hawkular maps with this Zone concept.
If it matches, also I wonder who is responsible to assign the tenant (the ownership of
tenant belongs to the agent? to hawkular server ? ManageIQ ?), how/when (at agent
installation? at hawkular installation? at ManageIQ provider registration ?).
It is still an open point but good to discuss about it to see possible and cascade
implications (i.e. mixed tenants are possible ? In which scenarios ?)
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "John Mazzitelli" <mazz(a)redhat.com>
Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
<hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Enviados: Viernes, 6 de Mayo 2016 23:08:26
Asunto: Re: [Hawkular-dev] accounts, tenants, the agent
> It seems to me we'd be better off using a single default, like
> "global-tenant".
Good point. I think we should just ship with a global "hawkular" tenant ID
pre-configured and just let the customer change it if he wants.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev