I definitely agree that:
- we need to make it easy to install
- an installer needs to be easy to maintain (reduce options in
particular)
We should also (re)consider our delivery options:
- zip vs docker vs VM vs RPMs
We also can't do all, and it has an impact on how the various parts work
together.
For the server, I think it would be extremely helpful to have a dedicated
property file for all the typical configuration. By typical, I mean, the IP
to the cassandra cluster, the IP to the Keycloak server, enable/disable the
internal agent with username/password...
Does anyone know how we can keep the configuration.xml files but point to
properties in a different file ? I think it would be extremely helpful for
a user and an installer to just have to edit a simpe and documented
property file rather than messing around with the standalone.xml file that
change over time.
Thomas
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Le 27/01/2016 13:19, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
> On 27 Jan 2016, at 12:48, Thomas Segismont wrote:
>
>> Simple scripts for common install tasks (add-user/etc...) should be
>> enough. And they should not require the server to be half-started but
>
> I am talking about this:
>
http://www.mastertheboss.com/jbossas/wildfly9/configuring-wildfly-9-from-...
Simple scripts could use the offline-cli, yes. AFAIU, The offline-cli
does not bind any port or deploy any component.
>
> Not what we had in RHQ.
>
>> simply operate on files.
>
> I don't think this is good for handling xml configs.
Do we have our own XML on top of what we already put inside standalone.xml?
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev