On 10 Nov 2015, at 19:09, Lucas Ponce wrote:
- A standalone use of Hawkular Metrics (mainly for OpenShift).
Which may add alerts in the future, which was the trigger
for this whole discussion.
- Hawkular, a integrated project of several components/subproject
(bus,accounts,metrics,alerts,inventory,agent,ui,new ones).
- Hawkular BTM (not sure if this will be consumed as part of Hawkular
as add-on, or a variant).
This will for sure add into Hawkular-all at some point in time.
- Hawkular DataMining module (not sure if this will be consumed as
part of Hawkular as add-on, or a variant).
As with BTM - DataMining is about prediction of potential
bad conditions and in the future possibly also about root cause
analysis.
It happens as our components are decoupled and can be consumed
separately, so it could be valid if the same user that is using
metrics in standalone can add alerts too to work together, but
probably that user is not interested in the full Hawkular solution as
it has developed its own security, feeds and inventory frameworks (or
any combination).
At the moment this is a SEP to me [1]. We need to
care about that OpenShift thingy and Hawkular-all.
So, if a user can deploy a metrics.war and alerts.war in the
deployments folder on a standard wildfly server, that could be
interesting an attractive for everyone (or at least that I think is
our main motivation for this discussion).
Which will most possibly be possible when Hawkular is
rebased to WF 10 where we will use the embedded
AMQ-Artemis broker.
have my conclusion clear: we need to go through Hawkular, not
replicating things, or in other words, focus all efforst in a single
solution that can be used in several scenarios.
+1
[1]
http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Somebody_Else's_Problem_field