Le 19/05/2015 15:32, Matt Wringe a écrit :
On 18/05/15 07:46 AM, Thomas Segismont wrote:
> Le 18/05/2015 12:07, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
>> On 18 May 2015, at 10:33, Thomas Segismont wrote:
>>>>>>>> Also if we do this, it means than most users will have to
configure all
>>>>>>>> the loggers template, because you usually want your logs
printed in
>>>>>> Which templates do you mean here?
>>>> What log4j calls "patterns" for pattern layouts.
>> Yes:-)
>> What I meant is for the loggers of ours software.
>> Or of the clients like managed WildFly servers.
>> If the later - wouldn't they need to modify something
>> anyway to send it to us?
> The clients issue is something I was concerned about too. But we had a
> conversation with Stefan and as long as clients send UNIX timestamps,
> everything should work fine (time since Jan,1 1970 00:00:00 UTC,
> regardless of the resolution).
>
For the timestamps, are you just looking at just seconds since the
epoch, milliseconds, nanoseconds? Is the timestamp going to just be a
simple numeric value that is passed (eg we can only ever pass
milliseconds since epoch) or something slightly more complex which
includes the resolution type?
All Metrics endpoints expect timestamps in milliseconds since the epoch.
The only exception is the Influx endpoint, where queries support
instants with a resolution.
For example:
select value from serie1 where time < 20y
Which means:
Load values of serie1 recorded in the 20 years following the epoch
And I assume that the machines internal clock being properly set and
periodically synchronized is outside of the scope of what Hawkular wants
to do.
Right.