Re: [Hawkular-dev] i18n

Le 10/06/2015 12:34, Thomas Heute a écrit : > > On 06/10/2015 12:11 PM, Thomas Segismont wrote: >>> Two things come to my mind: logging and REST API errors. >>> >>> * IIUC JBoss logging supports i18n. Am I wrong? > yes AFAIk it supports it, this is why we use an ID. Perfect > >>> >>> * Should we extend the error code pattern from logging (HAWKULAR10055) >>> to error responses, and have internationalized messages for them? > Could be a good thing, but the worry is more for end-users than developers. Wouldn't an internationalized error response be useful to UI developers?

_______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev