Re: [Hawkular-dev] open shift agent - what to call it?
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:19, Matt Wringe wrote:
> I wasn't keen on relying on "kubernetes" as part of
the name since
> its really
> targeting Open Shift and even then doesn't have to run in Open Shift
> (back
> to the ideas Heiko has for this thing).
I am not sure if I like the idea of one agent handling multiple
scenarios, I think it makes sense to keep them as separate agents.
My thinking went along the lines, that it should be possible to
test it and/or the interaction with the monitored resource without
the need for a full (mini)kube/shift.
As you say, we can also have a "library" for interaction with
hawkular and the monitored resource and then build multiple
apps on top that talk to k8s or OS or just run on a 'normal'
command line